AARON LEWIS Defends Draft Opinion That Would Overturn Roe v. Wade: ‘Stop Listening To The Lies’

STAIND frontman Aaron Lewis has defended the leaked draft opinion penned by Supreme Court docket justice Samuel Alito arguing that the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion ruling was “egregiously fallacious from the beginning.”

Almost three weeks after Politico printed the opinion, the outspoken conservative rocker addressed the prospect of SCOTUS overturning Roe throughout his Might 18 live performance on the Santander Area in Studying, Pennsylvania.

He stated (as transcribed by Phoosi): “You guys wanna speak about Roe versus Wade for a second? So let’s speak about that for a second, as a result of that is a very fucking delicate topic, ain’t it?

“So, here is the deal: since 1973, Roe versus Wade has stored we the folks from voting on abortion. That is it. That is fucking it. It would not make it authorized; it would not make it unlawful; it simply retains we the folks from voting on it. That is all. That is it.

“Fucking cease listening to the lies,” he continued. “The one factor that Roe versus Wade does is it retains we the folks from voting, whether or not in our personal state we would like it authorized or unlawful. It is our selection. If that is we the fucking folks. It’s not we that kisses the ring of our authorities; that’s not what this fucking nation is.”

In response to the Politico report, the draft was circulated in February. Alito was reportedly joined by justices Clarence Thomas and all three of former President Donald Trump‘s nominees — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — whereas justices Stephen Breyer, Elana Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor had been engaged on dissents. It was unclear how Chief Justice John Roberts voted.

The 1973 Roe v. Wade court docket choice affirmed the best to obtain an abortion underneath the 14th Modification, ruling that abortions had been constitutionally protected up till about 23 weeks when a fetus can usually reside outdoors the womb.

Within the 98-page draft, Alito stated Roe was wrongly determined, saying the problem needs to be determined by politicians, not courts. If Roe is reversed, it might not federally outlaw abortion. Nonetheless, it might shift the ability to states to determine on the process’s legality.

In response to CNN, almost half of the states have or will cross legal guidelines that ban abortion, whereas others have enacted strict measures regulating the process.

13 states have so-called “set off legal guidelines” in place, which might successfully ban abortions nearly instantly upon Roe v. Wade being overturned. In response to Axios, the restrictions that will comply with Roe being struck down by the Supreme Court docket would imply nearly 30% of individuals could be greater than 200 miles away from an abortion supplier.

In response to a Forbes, Individuals largely oppose harsh abortion legal guidelines, with 75% towards insurance policies that make it a prison offense to carry out an abortion, 69% opposing insurance policies that ban abortion six to eight weeks right into a being pregnant, 80% opposing legal guidelines that enable non-public residents to sue anybody who aids or abets an abortion and 63% supporting “secure haven legal guidelines” in Democratic-led states that will defend individuals who journey in from different states to get an abortion.

Critics have stated that tossing out the landmark rulings establishing abortion rights would tarnish the court docket’s fame and open the floodgates to different challenges to well-settled legislation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top